|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| DWI
& DUI Overview |
| DWI- DUI
Lawyers in Michigan, Indiana, and New Mexico |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| What
is a DUI? |
The
acronym "DUI" literally stands
for Driving Under the Influence. The most
common DUI offense is driving with a BAC
(blood-alcohol concentration) over the
legal limit of .08. However, DUI offenses
include operating a vehicle while under
the influence of any legal, illegal, prescription
or non-prescription drug as well as any
other substance that has mind altering
characteristics.
Indiana and many other states in the US
use the acronym "DUI" to denote
offenses related to operating a vehicle
under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
The specific criminal offense may be called,
depending on the jurisdiction, driving
while intoxicated (DWI), driving while
impaired (also DWI), operating while intoxicated
(OWI), operating a motor vehicle while
intoxicated (OMVI), or, of course, driving
under the influence (DUI). Such laws may
also apply to boating and piloting aircraft
depending on which state the offense occurs.
Even bicycling under the influence in
some states such as California can constitute
as a DUI.
Regardless of the term or acronym, it
is a criminal offense in all states to
drive a vehicle while under the influence
of alcohol, drugs, or a combination of
both. To be charged with this offense,
evidence of impairment as a result of
drugs or alcohol must be present and visible.
Today's statutes commonly provide for
two separate and distinct criminal offenses.
The first, the traditional "drunk
driving" offense, consists of driving
under the obvious influence of alcohol
and/or drugs clearly evident by physical
attributes such as erratic driving, slurred
speech, unsteady gait, and performance
on a field sobriety test. This crime generally
results from an officer's observations
of a vehicle or the reports of other motorists.
The second offense, commonly called a
"per se" offense, relies mainly
on the results of a blood alcohol concentration
(BAC) test given at the time of the incident
as evidence of the driver’s impairment
and/or intoxication. An individual may
be charged with both offenses if both
offenses are present.
Driving under the influence often results
in a misdemeanor charge for the driver
involved and is punishable by up to one
year in jail. However, the offense may
be elevated to a felony if the incident
involved a fatality, serious injury, or
extensive property damage. Accidents involving
serious injuries often result in a felony
DUI for the driver under the influence.
Accidents involving fatalities result
in the impaired driver receiving a much
stronger sentence, such as vehicular manslaughter
or vehicular homicide. Felony DUI charges,
vehicular manslaughter, and vehicular
homicide charges can all result in sentences
that include up to 3, 8, or 20 years in
an Indiana State prison.
Keller & Keller only represents the
victims of accidents that were either
partially caused or were the result of
the operation of a vehicle while under
the influence of alcohol and/or drugs.
If you have been injured in an accident
due to the negligence of an impaired driver,
our goal and purpose is to assist you
in recovering physically and financially.
Every case is different and presents is
own case specific challenges, however,
with over 70 years of experience, our
Indiana DUI litigation attorneys have
the knowledge necessary to handle any
legal situation that may arise.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| DUI
Statistics |
|
Drunk
driving affects everyone on the road.
Every 33 minutes in the United States,
someone dies as a result of an accident
involving an intoxicated driver. In Indiana,
DUI statistics are just as frightening.
Of all the motor vehicle accidents in
the State of Indiana involving fatalities
each year, around 17-19% are caused by
the negligence of an intoxicated Indiana
motorist. To further illustrate, in 2003,
serious Indiana auto accidents killed
835 Hoosiers. Of the 835 killed that year,
144 Hoosiers died as a direct result of
intoxicated driving. Approximately 3 of
10 Americans will be involved in an accident
involving a drunk driver at some point
in their lives. Furthermore, according
to a government study, over one third
of all deaths of people age 15-20 are
a result of driving while under the influence
of drugs or alcohol.
These statistics serve as clear evidence
as to why drunk driving or driving under
the influence is America's most commonly
committed violent crime. The Indiana State
Police made over 7000 DUI arrests last
year. DUI arrests appear to be on a downward
trend, which could be due to increased
awareness and tougher enforcement of Indiana
State laws. Your county prosecutor's office
brings justice every day by prosecuting
offenders who have injured or killed others
to the full extent of the law.
Similarly, Keller & Keller focuses
solely on proving the liability of the
negligent party by mandating them to pay
a monetary penalty for any injuries, fatalities,
and property damages that they may have
caused while under the influence. Our
Indiana DUI accident attorneys help clients
adversely affected by the negligent actions
of a drunk driver to restore their financial
and physical well being. Though lives
lost as a result of intoxicated driving
can never be restored, Keller & Keller
takes pride in fighting to make offenders
pay for their actions through a system
of justice.
A 2005 MADD and Nationwide Insurance
Survey Conducted by Gallup
Drinking and Driving: Americans' Greatest
Highway Safety Concern
- Driving under the influence of alcohol
or other drugs was listed as the greatest
highway safety problem by the largest
percentage of respondents (37 percent)--up
from 29 percent in 2000-- followed by
speeding (27 percent) and cell phones
(19 percent).
- Most respondents (94 percent) cite
driving under the influence of alcohol
as a major highway safety problem, followed
by driving under the influence of illegal
drugs (87 percent) and aggressive drivers
(83 percent).
Most Americans Support Sobriety
Checkpoints
- Eighty-seven percent say they support
the use of sobriety checkpoints to check
for drunk drivers.
- Support for sobriety checkpoints has
increased from 79 percent in 1993 to
83 percent in 2000 to 87 percent in
2005.
- Eighty percent say they would be discouraged
from drinking and driving by sobriety
checkpoints, up from 76 percent in 2000.
Top 10 Factors to Discourage Drunk Driving
- Realizing they could kill or injure
others .................................96
percent
- Realizing they could kill or injure
themselves ..........................91
percent
- Jail sentence .......................................................................91
percent
- Possibility of losing their license
............................................89
percent
- Paying substantial fines ........................................................85
percent
- Having car impounded ..........................................................85
percent
- Installing an ignition interlock in
vehicle if caught .....................81
percent
- Fear of losing their job ..........................................................80
percent
- Sobriety checkpoints ............................................................80
percent
- Increased auto insurance rates ..............................................80
percent
Most Americans Say "Yes"
to .08 BAC Drunk Driving Standard
- Eighty-eight percent of respondents
say they support .08 percent blood alcohol
concentration (BAC) as the illegal drunk
driving limit.
Driving Under the Influence /
Discouraging Impaired Drivers
- Sixty percent of those surveyed said
they had operated a car or truck under
the influence of alcohol or close to
being under the influence of alcohol,
up from 57 percent in 2000.
- Nearly one in five (17 percent) drivers
say they had, in the past week, encouraged
someone not to drive because they suspected
he/she had been drinking too much. Among
this group, three in every four (77
percent) said they were successful in
preventing someone from drinking and
driving.
Top 10 Methods to Reduce Drunk
Driving
- Encouraging the media to run free
public service ads ...........................................92%
- Requiring repeat offenders and high
BAC offenders to install an ignition
interlock...91%
- Giving convicted drunk drivers bigger
fines and longer jail terms.............................90%
- Requiring all DUI offenders to undergo
mandatory alcohol abuse assessment.........90%
- Making it illegal to have an open
container of alcohol in the car..............................89%
- Increasing news coverage of drinking
and driving...................................................87%
- Using sobriety checkpoints.................................................................................87%
- Requiring all drivers and passengers
to wear a seat belt........................................87%
- Authorizing impoundment and sale
of car belonging to repeat offender....................84%
- Initiating government restrictions
on alcohol advertising that appeals
to youth.....83%
|
| Calendar
Year |
Total Killed
in Alcohol Related Crashes |
|
Total Killed
inAll Traffic Crashes |
| |
Number |
Percent |
Number |
| 2000 |
17,380 |
41% |
41,945 |
| 2001 |
17,400 |
41% |
42,196 |
| 2002 |
17,524 |
41% |
43,005 |
| 2003 |
17,105 |
40% |
42,884 |
| 2004 |
16,919 |
39% |
43,836 |
| 2005 |
17,590 |
40% |
43,510 |
| 2006 |
17,602 |
41% |
42,642 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| DUI
Accidents |
|
In
2006, 17,602 people were killed as a result
of an auto accident involving alcohol
and thousands more sustained serious and
debilitating injuries. Most DUI accident
occur after dark, and an alcohol related
accident is 5 times more likely to occur
at night than during the day. Indiana
has made considerable effort in the past
5 years to reduce the amount of drunk
driving accidents that occur every year.
Random checkpoints, increased public awareness
through advertising, and increased police
patrols have decreased the amount of DUIs
and drunk driving accidents. However,
drunk driving continues to be the leading
cause of automobile related deaths in
the U.S.
Economists have studied the effects of
drunk driving accidents in an economic
perspective and have determined the cost
of drunk driving to our economy. Alcohol-related
crashes cost an estimated $45 billion
per year. It is also estimated that $70.5
billion is lost in quality of life due
to these crashes. Keller & Keller
only represents clients that have been
adversely affected by a drunk driver.
Our goal is to help restore any monetary
loss sustained by our clients as a result
of a negligent driver. Economic or monetary
damage can include property damage, medical
bills, foregone wages, and any other costs
directly caused by or associated with
the negligent acts of an intoxicated driver.
Furthermore, Keller & Keller aggressively
pursues compensation on behalf of our
clients to ensure that damages, including
pain and suffering, are properly addressed.
If you have been injured in an accident
in which the adverse driver was under
the influence of alcohol or drugs, an
experienced attorney can advise you of
your legal right to compensation. Keller
& Keller has practiced injury law
for over 70 years and has settled thousands
of cases involving injuries caused by
negligent drivers.
|
| BAC
Legal Limit |
|
The
acronym BAC literally stands for Blood
Alcohol Content or Blood Alcohol Concentration.
BAC is currently the most accurate method
of accurately documenting the amount of
alcohol that a person has consumed. In
Indiana, a person who has consumed enough
alcohol to receive a .08 BAC test cannot
legally operate a vehicle. There is a
substantial amount of scientific evidence
to justify the enforcement of this law.
A driver with a BAC of .10 or greater
is seven times more likely to be involved
in a fatal motor vehicle accident than
a driver who has not consumed any type
of alcoholic beverage. A driver with an
alcohol concentration of .15 or greater
is about 25 times more likely than a sober
driver. These numbers help to reveal the
dangerous propensity of drunk driving.
Operating a vehicle while under the influence
is both reckless and irresponsible and
endangers every driver on the road. For
this reason, Keller & Keller aggressively
pursues drivers who have caused bodily
injury or death while driving under the
influence. If you have been injured by
or involved in an accident caused by an
intoxicated driver, immediate action must
be taken to protect your legal right to
compensation for sustained damages.
A BAC report performed by state, county,
or local law enforcement must be obtained
and will play a vital role in your case
by providing evidence of the adverse driver's
gross display of negligence by driving
under the influence of alcohol. An experienced
attorney can expedite this process as
well as others throughout the process
of obtaining compensation.
Keller & Keller has practiced injury
law for over 70 years and has successfully
represented clients who are victims of
accidents involving impaired drivers.
We have settled thousands of cases for
clients located throughout the Midwest
who have been injured by the negligence
of others. Our experienced Indiana injury
attorneys will be able to provide trusted
legal advice and will work on your behalf
while you focus on the most important
process, restoring your health.
|
| Dramshop
Liability |
|
Dramshop,
in the United States, is a legal term
that refers to any type of establishment
which sells alcoholic beverages. Most
commonly, the term dramshop is used in
reference to a bar or tavern.
Dramshop liability refers to the specific
state and federal laws governing the liability
of taverns, liquor stores, and other establishments
that serve alcoholic beverages. Dramshop
liability is usually assessed after a
car accident or other type of accident
is caused by an intoxicated person. Through
dramshop liability, the bar or establishment
that sold the alcohol to the intoxicated
person that injured or killed another
person may be held liable for selling
alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person
or minor.
The laws are intended to protect the general
public from the hazards of irresponsible
establishments serving alcohol to minors
and intoxicated patrons. A 1993 study
from the National Bureau of Economic Research
found a minimal reduction in alcohol-related
fatalities after the implementation of
dramshop laws, however, even a small effect
is a step in a positive direction.
Factors to consider when assessing the
liability of an establishment include
the following:
- Did the establishment serve
a visibly intoxicated person?
When a customer slurs words or shows
other signs of drunkenness an establishment
should exercise discretion when deciding
whether to serve the patron another
drink.
- Did the establishment promote
drinking to excess? Different
types of promotional events that involve
selling large amounts of alcohol often
show that the restaurant isn't concerned
about the safety of its customers and
the other drivers which they may endanger.
- Is intentionally try to "up-sell"
alcoholic beverages a part of the establishment's
marketing plan? Many bartenders
and waitresses at establishments try
to convince patrons to consume larger
drinks or a greater number of drinks
then they would have chosen to consume
on their own.
Dram shop liability can be complicated
and tedious and requires a law firm that
is well versed in the set of laws in its
state of practice. Dram shop laws differ
from state to state and each state has
its own unique challenges. Each case has
its own set of unique challenges as well.
Keller & Keller has practiced injury
law for over 70 years and has acquired
a broad range of experience. If you have
been injured by the negligence of a drunk
driver, our Indiana injury attorneys can
help.
|
| Actual
DUI case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto
accidents caused by an impaired driver
are far too common and can have permanent
and devastating impacts to the lives of
the drivers involved. Since 1936, Keller
& Keller has been ensuring accident
victims that their rights are fully protected
while we pursue their injury claim. Our
firm has never wavered from the welfare
of its clients—their best interests
are our business.
Below is an example cases handled by the
Indiana DUI attorneys at our firm. Each
case is different, and past results are
not indicators of future settlements:
May 17, 2005, our client, was a passenger
in a vehicle driven by her friend that
was headed northbound on a two-lane road.
A drunk driver, southbound on the same
road, crossed the center line and struck
their vehicle head-on causing a devastating
accident. Tragically, the driver of our
client's vehicle died immediately at the
scene. Our client was severely injured
and was life-lined to the nearest hospital.
At the hospital, X-rays were done and
the diagnosis was severe. She had broken
bones in her leg and foot and would require
extensive surgery. She had broken multiple
ribs and had sustained a pulmonary contusion.
A large laceration on her head had required
numerous staples and stitches to control
the bleeding, but was stabilized at the
hospital.
Our client underwent two major surgeries
to repair the damage to her leg and foot
before beginning the 6 month process of
physical therapy and outpatient visits
to the doctor. During this time, our office
aggressively worked to uncover the facts
of the accident and to determine liability.
One factor that complicated this case
was that the adverse driver was found
guilty of driving under the influence
and was sentenced to serve time in jail.
Our attorneys worked with the authorities
and the driver's insurance company for
the chance to question the driver about
what exactly happened on the night of
the accident.
Keller & Keller was able to settle
our client's case for the maximum limits
provided under the insurance policy. Our
client, however, was still experiencing
health complications as a result of the
accident. Her doctors had advised our
office that our client would not be able
to work in the near future and would require
in-home care. Our client was concerned
about making ends meet and wondered where
her income would come from if she couldn't
work.
Following the settlement, Keller &
Keller referred her case to our Social
Security Disability department where we
managed her claim for disability benefits
through Social Security.
Every case possesses a different time
frame, projected value, and actual settlement.
Keller & Keller has the experience
necessary to accurately assess your case
and determine the most efficient course
of action. If you have been injured by
a negligent or drunk driver, call the
law offices Keller & Keller immediately
to schedule a free consultation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|